Wind And Natural Gas Are Killing Coal, Not ‘War On Coal,’ Study Claims


Cheap natural gas prices and the increasing availability of wind energy are pummeling the coal industry more than regulation, claims a new economic analysis from the University of Colorado Boulder and North Carolina State University.

Co-lead author Daniel Kaffine, a CU Boulder associate professor in economics, looked at natural gas, wind and coal-fired power generation across 20 U.S. states from 2008 to 2013 in the study, which was published in the American Economic Journal this month.

The study found a “significant” link between plummeting natural gas prices, increased wind generation capability and the drop-off in U.S. coal-burning.

“While either factor in isolation would have cut into coal’s share of the market, the combination of the two factors proved to be a potent one-two punch,” Kaffine says.

When the researchers applied 2013 natural gas prices and wind generation levels to the 2008 energy market, they found utilities likely would have cut coal-fired generation overnight. That suggests federal regulations, such as the 2014 Clean Power Plan, have not been main drivers in the decline of coal-generated electricity in the U.S., the study claims.

“The biggest single factor here is the decline in natural gas prices due to advances in drilling and production technologies used in natural gas extraction,” Kaffine continues. “To the extent there is a ‘war on coal,’ it’s a war being fought primarily in the marketplace between gas and coal.”

Coal-fired generation, according to the paper, dropped roughly 25% from 2007 to 2013, while natural gas prices decreased dramatically, largely due to hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Wind generation increased over that period, thanks to state-level renewable energy portfolio standards and declining costs, the report says.

The study, “The Fall of Coal: Joint Impacts of Fuel Prices and Renewables on Generation and Emissions,” found that natural gas prices had a larger impact on nationwide coal-fired generation than wind, but geography also played a factor, according to Kaffine.

“In the eastern U.S., where wind generation is less prominent and natural gas was particularly cheap, the fall in coal generation is almost completely driven by declining natural gas prices,” Kaffine explains. “However, in the central part of the U.S., wind played a more important role, though was still relatively less important than falling gas prices.”

Notably, according to the study, the decrease in coal-burning from 2007 to 2013 curbed carbon-dioxide emissions by 500 million tons annually – the equivalent of taking more than 100 million cars off the road each year.

Kaffine and his co-author, Harrison Fell, plan to follow up their research by diving into the local environmental impacts of wind generation in densely populated areas.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments