Iowa Report Refutes Human Health Risks Of Wind Turbines

2

As the number of wind turbines continues to grow across Iowa, researchers who evaluate public health hazards continue to find little scientific evidence to support claims of health problems caused by wind turbines, claims a recent report.

“With the rapid expansion of wind energy, some neighbors to wind turbines have claimed the sound has affected their health. While, to some, the sound might be annoying, research studies have established no adverse health effects,” states Peter Thorne, a professor and head of the University of Iowa’s Department of Occupational and Environmental Health.

A paper by Thorne; David Osterberg of the Iowa Policy Project (IPP), a nonpartisan, nonprofit public policy analysis and research organization; and Kerri Johannsen of the Iowa Environmental Council (IEC), a nonpartisan environmental coalition, reviews the health science on the issue.

The authors point out that health questions for wind power – and for any energy technology – are important ones that deserve examination. However, the paper concludes there is little scientific evidence that sound from wind turbines represents a risk to human health for neighbors.

“The kinds of concerns we have heard are not surprising,” says co-author Osterberg, lead environmental researcher for IPP.

“As we note in the paper, new technology often must answer to the various effects it may have on both economics and health. Too often, the human and environmental impacts are separated from the economic questions, as we have seen with the substantial health burdens brought by fossil-fuel-based power generation,” Osterberg continues.

“Most will agree that economic or technological progress should not introduce health problems,” says Kerri Johannsen, energy program director with the IEC. “To find if problems exist with wind electricity production, well-constructed scientific studies, rather than anecdotes or unsubstantiated sources, should be our guide.”

The report states as follows:

“A basic concept from the science of public health requires that a human health risk be a true hazard and that there is exposure to that hazard. Wind turbines produce sound pressure, but if the frequency is at or below the threshold of human perception and the sound pressure level is low at area residences, there is little or no exposure to cause human health problems.”

The authors point to two authoritative, peer-reviewed surveys on the topic of wind turbines and health: a 2015 review by the Council of Canadian Academies and a 2014 report by Robert J. McCunney, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

In the Canadian study, a panel of nine university professors and an engineering firm CEO evaluated available studies and literature.

While the panel found sufficient evidence that wind turbines can cause annoyance, they also noted that current evidence is not sufficient to establish whether the level of annoyance is related to the visual impact of the turbines or other factors such as personal attitudes.

The authors of the Canadian review said studies completed so far do not measure noise independently from these factors. There is also a lack of data about baseline levels of annoyance without the turbines, the size of the annoyance effect, and how the impact changes in different wind and weather conditions.

“That is an important point,” Osterberg remarks. “We need to be able to separate the scientific evidence that could affect an individual’s perspective.”

The MIT review found no evidence that people residing close to wind turbines experience disease outcomes, but it did find that some people experienced annoyance with the turbines or turbine noise, similar to the findings in the Council of Canadian Academies review.

However, this review also found that the percent of trial participants expressing annoyance varied. Those who received compensation for having turbines on their land reported little annoyance. Additionally, subjects who were shown websites and films purporting to show that turbines could cause health problems were more likely to report symptoms.

“Repeated scientific studies have shown that receiving misinformation about wind turbine health effects can actually cause people to experience symptoms,” says Johannsen. “It is critical that factual information on this issue is shared to avoid unnecessary suffering.”

The paper concludes, “Given the evidence… and the well-documented negative health effects and environmental impacts of power produced with fossil fuels, we conclude that development of electricity from wind is a benefit. We have not seen evidence that wind turbines pose a threat to neighbors.”

The full report is available here.

2
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

avatar
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
ErlandoChase Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Chase
Guest
Chase

Physiological and physical injuries are different. Dogs for instance will “feel” storms or thunder long before most humans. Bigger turbines moving much more air than smaller can have the same effects. Yes this requires more study, but at what or who’s expense.

Erlando
Guest
Erlando

Turbines do not move air. Air moves turbines.