ABB_id2059
in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

Utility NSTAR's no-bid contract to purchase electricity from the Cape Wind offshore wind farm at three times the price of competing out-of-state green energy violates federal law and would unfairly burden ratepayers, claims a new lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court by the Town of Barnstable, businesses, residents and the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound. The alliance notes this action is one of several pending legal challenges to the 468 MW Cape Wind project, proposed off the coast of Nantucket Island.

The new suit against Massachusetts regulators, NSTAR and Cape Wind alleges the State discriminated against out-of-state companies by pressuring NSTAR to buy power from in-state generator Cape Wind. The suit also claims Massachusetts regulators exceeded their authority in setting wholesale rates for this contract.

"This state action was illegal for two independent reasons. First, it constituted illegal discrimination in favor of an in-state business, in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution," the suit alleges. "Second, it constituted illegal regulation of wholesale electricity sales, in violation of the Federal Power Act and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution."

"We understand the need for green energy, but it is unfair to be forced to pay three times more for Cape Wind," says plaintiff, Joe Keller, president of Keller Company Inc.

The suit claims NSTAR sought to comply with the Massachusetts requirement that a percentage of power come from renewable sources by buying green energy that was cheaper than Cape Wind. However, the complaint alleges that state regulators refused to support NSTAR's long-sought merger with Northeast Utilities until NSTAR contracted to buy the higher priced Cape Wind power.

"According to NSTAR's own estimates, the unconstitutional NSTAR-Cape Wind contract will increase the electricity bills of NSTAR customers by nearly 1 billion dollars over the life of the contract," the suit alleges.

Audra Parker, president and CEO of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, comments, "Our case alleges that NSTAR was coerced into signing a no-bid contract that violates federal law. The State's actions are even more disturbing given the increasing availability of alternative energy available at a fraction of Cape Wind's price."



Trachte_id2056
Latest Top Stories

The Song Remains The Same: AWEA Says Stable Policy Can Protect U.S. Wind Investment

Although the U.S. wind industry added more than four times the amount of wind in 2014 compared with 2013, predictable policy is needed to sustain its long-term success.


High Net-Worth Investors Claim 'All Of The Above' On Energy, Renewable And Otherwise

According to a recent Morgan Stanley poll, high-dollar investors favor investment in renewable energy technologies, such as wind and solar.


U.S. Wind Power Installations Surpassed 4.7 GW Last Year, Although China Still Leads

Bloomberg New Energy Finance reports that U.S. wind installations came back in a big way from a disappointing 2013.


IRS Specifies Performance, Quality Standards For Small Wind Turbines

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued guidelines creating safety and performance standards for small wind turbines to be eligible for the 30% investment tax credit.


Hot Times North Of The Border: Canada Tops Previous Record For Installed Wind Capacity

For the second consecutive year, Canada's wind market has bested the country's previous mark for new installations.

Hybrid Energy Innovations 2015